NR Building Solutions

Who we serve · Property management companies

For property management companies

You are accountable to an owner for work you do not perform, with a vendor file that is slow to open and a contractor who answers a different phone in every market.

Send us your onboarding requirements

Your checklist, covered

  • Onboarding file returned complete, not assembled after the request
  • Work received and invoiced through the platform you already run
  • One named contact across every community you manage
  • Invoicing structured to post against your accounting, not to be re-keyed

Accountable for work you do not perform

A management company sits in an awkward position: the owner holds you responsible for the outcome, the contractor holds the work, and the paperwork in between is yours to reconcile.

Everything on this page is aimed at that specific position rather than at the owner's economics.

The vendor file is the first friction, and it is avoidable

Most of the time it takes to open a vendor is spent waiting for a contractor to produce documents they should already have.

Ours come with no form in front of them. Our W-9, written safety programme and certificates of insurance (general liability and workers' comp) are being prepared; each document is posted on vendor credentials as it is on file.

The practical effect is that the constraint moves from our paperwork to your platform's review queue, which is where it should be. A contractor who takes three weeks to produce a W-9 or a written safety programme is telling you something about how they will handle a change order.

Work in and invoices out, through what you already run

We receive work and invoice through the platforms our clients use, in the ways those platforms support.

Invoicing that posts rather than gets re-keyed

An invoice that arrives in the wrong shape is a person's afternoon, every month, in your office.

Invoices are structured at onboarding against how you actually account — by community, by property code, by cost center — and matched against the purchase order. The goal is that your team posts them rather than rebuilds them.

One escalation path

For a management company running communities for several owners across several markets, the single most useful thing about consolidating a trade is that escalation stops beginning with context.

One named contact who already knows which communities you manage, which owner each belongs to, and what the standing scope is. Not a dispatch queue, and not a different relationship per market.

Reporting you can forward

Milestone photographs and per-unit scope and cost in a consistent format, so what you send an owner is evidence rather than a summary you had to write.

You are accountable for work you did not perform. The documentation is what makes that position defensible, and it should not be something you assemble.

Common questions

That depends more on us having the documents ready than on anything else, which is why we keep them current rather than assembling them on request. Send us your requirements package and we will turn the file around — the constraint is usually your platform's review queue rather than our paperwork.

We work through the platforms our clients run — Yardi, ServiceChannel, Corrigo, Fexa, Officetrax, PropertyMeld, RentManager and ManageAmerica among them — in the ways those platforms support. That means work orders in and invoices out. It does not mean a built integration, and we will not imply one.

One named person, for every community you manage. The value of a single vendor to a management company is largely that escalation does not begin with explaining which community and which owner.

Milestone photographs and per-unit scope and cost, in a consistent format, so what you forward to an owner is evidence rather than a summary you wrote. You are accountable for work you did not perform; the documentation should make that defensible.